Ethics Essay Example for Free

Ethics EssayBusinesses ar concerned with their conjunction fancy, breaking of the justnesss in work related duties and any doing that bequeath involve a fairness lawsuit against the ships association. This is mainly their reputation and restoring it will involve a lot of m cardinaly. To avoid all of this, they adapt a example behavior in realizeing what is right and wrong for the company. Therefore ethics are derived from the moral obligations, profit maximization and in following the laws set. In valet ethics, an privateistic is expected to pr n geniusthelesst harm, be fair and just, respect the opinion of new(prenominal)s, have a heart for other(a)s, to be h unitaryst and wiling to comply with the law (Pojman, 2004). In professionalism, there is need for objectivity and impartiality, avoidance of interlocking of interest, confidentiality of information, duty of care respected, integrity and erective disclosure of information. History of utilitarianism A propo sition on utilitarianism lie with Hume only if its formulation and earning identification is received by Bentham. It was incorporated during the 18th century. It was intended to view the teaching of public utility and the motivation of benevolentity beings. They found out that delight and pain were humans utility and that what generates to a greater extent satisfaction to many hatful is the ultimate right.However, having a large number being happy was difficult thus they settled for principle of happiness to represent utilitarianism. Since then, it has been an influence to economics and apply to brave out different political moves. Introduction Utilitarianism is a principle of moral ethics. It supports that a moral right locomoteion in a situation is the one that produces more than advantages than disadvantages (Buckle, 2007). Many individuals use this type of ethics in daily closes as it brings more benefits even if lies or manipulation of others were used.It is eas ily aid sin decision making process. The required courses of exertions are set then their advantages and disadvantages in prize are highlighted and lastly the action that generates more advantages is then selected to be morally right. It is characterized by the relevant consequences, impartiality and neutrality of the action as every soulfulnesss happiness is counted the same. The act and rule utilitarianism are its types and have been competing on which real should be followed. In act, what benefits the citizenry more is the right morals despite their different feelings.However, the rule type acknowledges the justice, fairness and benefits a large number of people. Therefore the rule values the people feelings, their laws and the benefits. They both have problems in comparing the exact consequences value in funds and happiness since they all differ. They believe in obligation to the social club and not the act of being a heroine. Since it is consequences on choice, they ten d to predict the future. However, act type will be approbatory to one today and may be unfavorable the next day. The rule type on the other hand, is very instable on what is actually morally right.Utilitarianism can be objective in financial backing the effect that the rightness of an activity is whether it would indeed encourage and promote the erectness of the already available acts to the agents. On the other side, it can adjourn the form of subjective utilitarianism. It involves that when choosing an activity one should primary determine which activities of those available would in general promote the good more than the others, then chose that activity. Critics against utilitarianism It is difficult t assign value in currency form to certain items and acts such as human life, happiness, pain, pleasure and more feelings (Pojman, 2004).They could be representing oppositions ideas in the sense that aroundones pleasure could be another individuals pain. This does straighten out the comparison of values difficult for a person to choose what action will give a high better pleasure. The benefits and costs value may be underestimated or overestimated. This principle violates the human witting acts and the different personal ideas in interest of more valuable advantages of an action. Its like it gives us authority to do harm but specifically little harm in order to gain. In testify then, little or more harm is still harm, it never changes.Lying for the sake of saving more benefits represents an injustice to human kind. It does not promote justice but rules in favor of injustice. It is difficult to know how right an action is when the law seconds some offences committed with the excuse of the principle of utilitarianism. It does not follow the law guide thus can at all times be interchanged to commit plague. The integrity, reputation and image of a person are confused with utilitarianism ethics. The consequences of a lie for the sake of creating more pr ofits to a company, kills the integrity that was taught of being present.Maintenance of reputation is not easy and therefore loosing the little you have will mean a slow start in creating another image. It does not encourage creativity and study of products and services as it tends to cut out considerations of new ideas generation. To other individual this is a difference making on what and how they feel. They argue that each one is responsible for what hey do and not the value of how they do it. An individual might be creative and willing to undertake his idea a step ahead and achieve it, may not succeed at all if the majority umber do not support his idea.Therefore, a chance of having had to grow an idea in other people no matte how good it would have been, is lost because of this system. It relies full(a)ly on a single principle of ethics thus an action committed could either produce best or worst consequences despite the argument that it will grant more benefits. Different p rinciples in deciding what is right or wrong have to be used on a single action so as to make the solution effective and efficient. It uses the human being as means to an end of suitable action by only considering happiness and equating it as the main pleasure of a person.By only counting happiness, it encourages individuals to do the right things for an entire wrong reason. After all, they can justify the evil doing as their happiness. The theory also concentrate on a belief that human are common in nature thus desires same things. It discourages the individuals tastes and preferences. Some people even appreciate more things than others who do not even take an narration of the thing presence. Humans are very different in personalities and their goals also differ. Grouping them a sonly one group of nature, is not justice and happiness at all.It does not take into considerations the potential purport of an individual in carrying out an action. An individual could be fulfilling his evil motives on an individual but ends up defending himself using the utility benefits thus being set free and innocent. Every action should be accounted for legally so truth of right and wrong could be identified. A person stealing money and justifying it that it was to be used for a sick person medical expenses, might b lying or not. He might be a thief in the making. Critics in support of utilitarianism In human moral life, majority value the self sacrificial factor and happiness.Utilitarianism supports these morals in their decisions as some are sacrificed and the happiness of the people affected by the consequence mattering a lot (Mayer, 2009). An individual cognise for self sacrificial mostly promotes peace, loyalty and unity. If an organization is willing to sacrifice some items for the entire society benefits, it is received well and brings happiness which is the goal of utilitarianism. It promotes equality, impartiality, fairness and neutrality in all its decisions (Buckl e, 2007). This is because to them no one deserves special treatment at the expense of another as they are all equal.A decision is basically made from everybodys point of view with consideration of the majority. If the majority needs a company closed down, then that percentage would be a representation that every individual of that area wants the company closed. The consideration of the outcome of an activity is important. This theory is in support of knowing the consequences first before working class an action. The consequences received should be of great value that would not contribute to pain but joy. These would prepare the users to strikingness the outcome with an open mind as they had been expecting it.They could be outcomes based on researches or people personal experiences. In addition, it aids in future planning of activities leading to enhancement of efficiency. This system is straightforward and come out in evaluation because it conveniently uses one denominator in its evaluation calculations. Therefore, it becomes easy in resolving conflict interests for straightforward answers to the decision. An easy way to resolve things is many people choice as many of them understand it, support it and ready to conceptualize into their daily activities.This ensures less money and minimal time spent in evaluations process. Nietzsche on ethical concept, background and theories He explained that the existence of structure theories is as a result of leading who dominate their decisions over others. He argues that it is through self consciousness that one can determine the evil and the good with its both doers. He did not support the utilitarianism principle of ethics and argued that it placed too some(prenominal) emphasis on the large numbers of people instead of an individual that his personal welfare is lost to the general crowd.In addition, his other reason was that humans do things just to survive in this founding even if they were unpleasant or unhappy. Utilitarianism show there is a wrong and a right but according to him this are the terms men use to interpret a situation or experience. He believes human will be motivated by to many thing snot only pleasure, happiness and pain. Aristotle ethical concepts, background and theories He showed that conduct depended on the role of an individual habit. He said that it was in between pleasures and pain that allowed one to choose which indeed was right or wrong.Being a personal credit line minded person, he advices that the root to fairness, justice and happiness is in asking questions. He does not uses utility in his work but stresses that the behavior of a person is what is reflected on his performance and goodness, thus supporting the theory of virtue of ethics and not consequences (History of Utilitarianism, 2009). He campaigned that happiness of a person could only be known after his life and thus could not be short termed using utilitarianism. ConclusionsUtilitarianism should take into account that not only making people happy is a pleasure but also involving one in the success of the project, institution, a career and a cause to ensure that they are committed. Many people though support it because it is easy to use, they have practice of using it daily and it tends to avoid the divine revelation of living morally but outside the belief in a supernatural being. A person deciding should include other principles and theories of ethics that are likely to affect an action and determine if they are right or wrong.They could use principle of virtue, moral right, egoism, deontological, justice and fairness and their emotions reflected in their feelings. This would give a wide reflection balance of the choice picked. In all the actions an individual undertakes from a selection, he should first weigh their goodness and badness and not necessarily through its money value alone. One should be able to know how the action would affect him, the law and the society. An evi l action such as kill a corrupt leader for money should not be justified that it made everyone evil that had locomote into his corrupt evils.