Comparison of King Lear and Gloucester

English IV January 31, 2012 Love, and be silent As peerless of Shakespe ars around famous tragedies, the story of King Lear reflects the two extremes of valet nature-- erotic love and subjection, lies and betrayal. In such a interwoven world, Shakespeare ironic aloney contrasts the physical qualities to the robuster meanings of sightlessness and sight throughout the tragic lives of the King and Gloucester. Their lack of taste cause their hearts to be blinded by their deviant misgivings of love and trust at the early stages where they can relieve physically see; scarce it is also such cecity that helps King Lear and Gloucester to find their befuddle water visions back to go down the candor after deep self-realizations when the blindness reaches to its extreme. Both universe fathers and noble men, King Lear and Gloucester are fooled by the flattering wrangle which they are used to and submit the children who devote true love to them. It is unfair to say that they do not love those children, but their wrong tolerant set caused by their special social status have create a false understanding of real love and loyalty within their minds. As Lear says in front of all his people, [he] loves [Cordelia] close to and thought to set [his] lie in/ On her kind nursery (1.1.124-25), but when his pride takes everyplace his senses, such unwavering love turns out to be surpassing expectations of apparent and unmindful flattery from Cordelia. Physically being satisfactory to see all the praises and loyalties people has devoted to him, Lear yet has been genuinely blinded in heart by his lack of insight. nutriment in his bear world which full of lies and pretenses, the King loses his clear vision to determine what the reality is. Also misjudging the truth, Gloucester shows his weakness from accept in Edmund, the... If you neediness to get a full essay, piece it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
!
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper