.

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

Law Of Nations: An Overview :: essays research papers

Law of Nations An Overview forgiving nature consists of three basic components. These are to live, topropagate and to dominate. If Humanity was left over(p) without any other parameters,this natural state of existence would govern its behavior. Fortunately, thereare parameters that exist. These parameters are legal philosophy. The topic of this paperaddresses the type of truth that operates in creating potential boundaries forthe behavior of states. This law is called the Law of Nations or internationallaw. Patrick Moynihan, a senator from New York, has written a book on thissubject called On the Law of Nations. His book argues that states needinternational law to monitor their actions and to advance order. He as well asnotes the frequent departures states do from international law. This essay pass on reflect his plea to return to the norms that international law providesit will also discuss and identify the moral dilemmas that are present withinternational law and its relatio nship with states.     The landmark "laisser aller" or "letting go" is used by Friedrich Nietzscheto describe this state of nature, in which man resides absently of law. Hisuse of the term represents the struggle morality wages against nature andreason. He equates morality in any form, with "tyranny and unreason."Nietzsche proposes that mans natural existence be, in essence, nihilistic.Logically, the political entity cognise as the state, created by man will inheritthese traits. Thus, the conclusion is that the substructure and institution ofinternational law are in direct impact to nature.     However, international law exists and states "generally" submitthemselves to it. . Since most of this law is derived from systematize norms ofstates, the term submission can be used. There is a ill turn committed tohumanity when the law is broken, not just to those who are weaker in the globalcommunity but to the law itself. A violent raping of the law is committed whenit is taken in an a la carte form. The unvaried shifting back and forth frominternational law to nature creates an scattered system and a basis forcalling the reversion to the natural state, evil. In this setting "illegal"unilateral action is immoral. Conversely, the adherence to the law is evenlyimmoral. This conclusion is drawn from the virtue of integrity. Either have acommitment to comply with morality or completely abstain from a hypocriticalform of servicing the law with words and no conformity. Consistency, is anextremely crucial factor of a system of law.     Moynihan argues that the United State has begun to traverse a pathleading away from its adherence to international law.

No comments:

Post a Comment