Socrates And Aristotle On Virtues

Socrates And Aristotle On VirtuesSocrates and Aristotle argon both ancient philosophers. In their work they both taught on the estimation of ethics and virtues. They believed in virtues besides their understanding of what is means to be faultless were different (Lutz, 1998). This is why their t for each oneing on virtue as sanitary as their lives and decisions contradicted. This paper is a critical comparison between Aristotles eyeshade of virtue and Socrates account of virtue.The similarity that exists in these teachings is that they believed in existence of virtues and taught their students on what is means to be staring(a) nevertheless from their different understanding. The two philosophers believed in individuals possessing intellectual virtues. The common thread on the teachings of the two was the fact that volume possessed certain virtues (Lutz, 1998). The virtues represent the most significant qualities for a psyche to possess. The two philosophers taught that having virtues was advantageous. Nevertheless, there atomic number 18 various differences on the government agency each understood and approached the subject.The differences in the accounts of virtues by the two philosophers are not only revealed in their teachings but besides their way of life. Both Aristotle and Socrates were charged with impiety, but their differing understanding of what is virtuous and right led them to different actions. When Socrates was convicted to death, he authoritative it and allowed himself to be executed. When he was offered to pay a fine for his crime he refused. He also refused to honour the pleas of Plato and his former(a) students to run away in a boat they had ready for that purpose. Socrates is known to be a military personnel who lived what he preached (Sherman, 1997). He refused to break the law even in the typesetters case of death and wanted to set a good example to his students. In a way through his act, he wait oned some of the questions he had constitute to his students on virtue and courage. His actions also lived up to the fact that he advocated for friendly relationship and true sense of commonality. This is what led Socrates to willingly accept his death reprobate when most bulk thought he would flee. Socrates believed that running away from the business office amounted to going against his communitys will. As a pursuit of personal felicity, Aristotle on the other hand refused to accept his charges and fled. This is because Aristotles thinking was based on individual happiness and pleasure (Sherman, 1989).Un comparable Socrates, when Aristotle was charged with impiety, he took the easy way out. He ran away rather than stay to face the charges. This tells us a atomic reactor about Aristotle. This is also evident in his argument that the final design of human beings is happiness. He argued that living a virtuous life is something pleasurable. In his argument, the virtuous man takes pleasure in living a virtuo us life. In his argument, it seems like devoid of virtues, a person cannot achieve happiness. It is like virtue is the linking aspect to happiness. This is in contrast with the theory of Socrates who argues that the best way of life is focusing on self-development instead of pursuing material things (Lutz, 1998).In his teachings, Socrates never revealed answers, nor did he reveal the truth. Socrates never taught the truth but taught his students how to find out the truth by themselves. He just taught his students to discover. Socrates knew that no person could answer the questions concerning courage, virtue and duty to his satisfaction. People just claimed to be virtuous and doughty without really knowing what this meant (Sherman, 1989). On the part of Aristotle, being virtuous was a thing that people could not only understand but also achieve. Aristotle disagrees with Socrates in arguing that ethics is primarily about virtues. Socrates also argues that a person can have virtues w ithout necessarily having the kind of knowledge that typifies mathematics of nature science. Aristotle is capable of demonstrating that ethics and personal interest may be related, that ethics is well-suited to common sense, and that a virtuous person is capable of achieving keen-sighted decisions. Aristotle also made a distinction between two kinds of virtues respectable and intellectual. Ethical virtues come about through habitual actions. He argued that people are born with the capacity to live a virtuous life. He also argues that education is essential in establishing human capability to arrange virtuous acts habitual. Aristotle believed that people have to act virtuously as a great deal as they can and by doing so they make a tint in becoming virtuous. He also believes that ethical virtues need to be attended with pleasure. He believed that human beings cannot be exposed to pain when they are acting virtuously. If a person is exposed to pain as a result of an action, then he cannot be considered virtuous (Sherman, 1989).Unlike Socrates who believed in doing what is right, Aristotle believed that too much and too little are always wrong. He argued that virtuous acts are always midway states between the contrasting vices of superfluity and deficiency. This is unlike the idea of Socrates where there was no compromise or tractableness in being good. Aristotles theory of virtues allows for flexibility.Socrates stresses that virtue was the most important obstinance and that life must be lived in pursuit of good (Sherman, 1997). man both of the philosophers believed in the benefit of having virtues, it is Socrates who stresses more than Aristotle the importance of the virtues. In his Socrates posture there is no go between people had to be good. In Socrates theory the idea of happiness and pleasure brings in an aspect of compromise. amid the two philosophers, it is Socrates who forms the best example of living a virtuous life.