.

Friday, March 22, 2019

The Strengths and Weaknesses of the DSM-IV Classification System for Di

The Strengths and Weaknesses of the DSM-IV Classification System for Diagnosing Psychopathology IntroductionDSM-IV as a system of diagnosis has been criticised on its very foundation that far from up(p) the clinical practice it claims to have prioritised. To assess its strengths and impuissancees, the essay critically examined the break up of DSM-IV and how its practice and techniques have been practically found useful. As in the interpretation offered by Allen (1998) the concept stands for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, quaternary Edition. As a system, Allen (1998) added that, it details the diagnostic criteria for nearly 300 moral deflects and nearly 100 other psychological conditions. Stressing its strengths, many studies highlighted on its interrogation focus that its authors have over-concentrated on its reliability which further led to its animadversion. This criticism among other thing include the neglect some of the issues concerning clinici ans, lack of preciseness in of its criteria, and bias that emanate from the technique that predetermine the patients disorders. The essay, however, have subject field literature based on the various issues raised as to its weakness and how these weakness to be overcome. Given the last points, comparative studies conducted on advancement measures to the clinical practices are examined. There are considerable issues to highlight in evaluating strengths and limitations of using DSM-IV as a method for diagnosing psychopathology. These are its dialect on reliability and validity of it diagnostic criteria and classification methods and techniques. The strengths and limitations in the practise of DSM-IV, as could be observed, depend on the technique and the purposes th... ...tent/full/156/11/1677 accessed on 24th/11/2010Ronald, C (2006), Clinical calibrations of DSM-IV Diagnoses in the land Mental Health (WMH) Version of the World Health Organisation (WHO) multiform Internatio nal Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI). International Journal of Methods in psychiatric Research, Vol. 13/2. Samuel, D. B. and Widiger, T. A. (2006), Clinicians Judgements of Clinical Utility A Comparison of the DSM-IV and Five-Factor Models. Journal of deviant Psychology, Vol. 115/5. Accessed on 25/11/2010Semiz UB, Basoglu C, Oner O, Munir KM, Ates A, Algul A, Ebrinc S, Cetin M. (2008), Effects of diagnostic comorbidity and dimensional symptoms of attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder in men with antisocial personality disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 42(5)405-13. Online http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18473259 accessed on 24/11/2010

No comments:

Post a Comment